DeTata v. Rollprint Packaging Products Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a phone call with EEOC did not constitute sufficient notice of right to sue when plaintiff had not yet received written notice and there was no evidence that the ninety-day window was discussed during the phone call
• analyzing the notice requirement in light of the short length of the 90-day filing period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cephia Hayes v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
  Third Circuit· 2024-07-19· cited 19×
• STAROPOLI v. Donahoe
  District of Columbia· 2011-05-25· cited 13×
• Mills v. Hayden
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-01-04· cited 5×
• Staropoli v. Potter
  District of Columbia· 2011-05-25
• Mills v. Hayden
  District of Columbia· 2018-01-04

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 1,661×
• Taylor v. Books a Million, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2002-07-15· cited 892×
• Alfred St. Louis v. Alverno College
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-10-29· cited 117×
• Christine Kerr v. McDonald's Corporation
  Eleventh Circuit· 2005-10-06· cited 102×
• Jeannette M. GATES, Appellee, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1974-02-22· cited 96×
• Windell Threadgill v. Moore U.S.A., Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-10-19· cited 87×
• Cynthia A. Ebbert v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation
  Third Circuit· 2003-02-04· cited 60×
• Evelyn L. Houston v. Sidley & Austin
  Seventh Circuit· 1999-07-26· cited 56×
• Providencia Ball v. Abbott Advertising, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1988-12-27· cited 37×
• Y. Sandra Reschny, Formerly Known as Y. Sandra Curran v. Elk Grove Plating Company, an Illinois Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-07-15· cited 23×