DeTata v. Rollprint Packaging Products Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a phone call with EEOC did not constitute sufficient notice of right to sue when plaintiff had not yet received written notice and there was no evidence that the ninety-day window was discussed during the phone call
• analyzing the notice requirement in light of the short length of the 90-day filing period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).