· 1/21/2014
Desue v. Kinsaul
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 1007
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 855
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3424
- 571 U.S. 1166
- 2014 WL 210713
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 733
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that ascertainability “requires only that a class be defined using objective criteria that establish a membership with definite boundaries”
- rejecting administrative feasibility requirement and only requiring objective criteria that establish membership with definite boundaries
- mentioning limitations inherent in Section 11 (citing 15 U.S.C. § 77k(a))
- “Where individualized questions permeate the litigation, those ‘fatal dissimilarit[ies]’ among putative class members ‘make use of the class-action device inefficient or unfair.’” (alteration in original)
- “The ascertainability doctrine that governs in this Circuit requires only that a class be defined using objective criteria that establish a membership with definite boundaries.”
- “The ascertainability doctrine that governs in this Circuit requires only that a class be defined using objective criteria that establish a membership with definite boundaries.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.