Destination Ventures, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[b]ecause Congress has addressed a substantial interest in protecting consumers from the economic harms inflicted through unsolicited advertisement faxes ... the subsequent banning of those unsolicited faxes directly advances that interest”
• stating that A [b]ecause Congress has addressed a substantial interest in protecting consumers from the economic harms inflicted through unsolicited advertisement faxes . . . the subsequent banning of those unsolicited faxes directly advances that interest @
• \The TCPA ... has the purpose of preventing the unfair shifting of advertising costs from the advertiser to the unwilling consumer.\
• “Because Congress has addressed a substantial interest in protecting consumers from the economic harms inflicted through unsolicited advertisement faxes .. the subsequent banning of those unsolicited faxes directly advances that interest.”
• “[T}he court has made a de novo determination of the entire matter presented. The court adopts the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas filed December 14, 1993 as its own opinion.”
• “[T}he court has made a de novo determination of the entire matter presented. The court adopts the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas filed December 14, 1993 as its own opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).