Dessaure v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecutor’s closing argument was proper when he reviewed the evidence presented and then “explicated reasonable inferences that could be drawn from [the] evidence”
• “Closing argument presents an opportunity for both the State and the defendant to argue all reasonable inferences that might be drawn from the evidence.”
• \A trial judge's ruling on the admissibility of evidence will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.\
• “A trial judge’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.”
• \A trial judge's ruling on the admissibility of evidence will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.\
• “An order granting mistrial is required only when the error upon which it rests is so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial, making a mistrial necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).