· 9/25/2013
Desrosiers v. Hartford
Citations
- 979 F. Supp. 2d 1036
- 28 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 971
- 2013 WL 5406875
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137850
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressee name and address on letter “was developed by . . . counsel, and reveals mental processes and legal theories developed in anticipation of litigation, and is therefore protected by the work product doctrine.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: England
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.