Skip to main content
· 9/25/2013

Desrosiers v. Hartford

Citations

  • 979 F. Supp. 2d 1036
  • 28 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 971
  • 2013 WL 5406875
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressee name and address on letter “was developed by . . . counsel, and reveals mental processes and legal theories developed in anticipation of litigation, and is therefore protected by the work product doctrine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: England

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.