Desnick v. Mast

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \we expect[ed] that\ the district court judge whose participation had been challenged \would prefer not to sit further on the case\
• mutual abandonment must be clearly expressed and the acts of the parties must be positive and unequivocal
• recusal not required where attorney who represented the judge in an unrelated matter never had any formal conferences with the judge because the case was disposed of before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).