M.D. Florida· 12/5/1962
DeSilva Construction Corp. v. Herrald
Citations
- 213 F. Supp. 184
- 137 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 96
- 1962 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the assignment of copyright under 1909 Act does not include the right to sue for “infringements antedating the assignment” and since the assignment as written failed to con- tain such a grant, “no such right is conferred by the assign- ment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lieb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nancey Silvers v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2005-03-25· cited 158×
- Aitken, Hazen, Hoffman, Miller, P. C. v. Empire Construction Co.D. Nebraska· 1982-05-13· cited 41×
- Demetriades v. KaufmannS.D. New York· 1988-03-08· cited 38×
- Edgar H. Wood Associates, Inc. v. SkeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1964-04-17· cited 36×
- Schuchart & Associates, Professional Engineers, Inc. v. Solo Serve Corp.W.D. Texas· 1982-04-21· cited 35×
- Richard S. Prather v. Neva Paperbacks, Inc., Playtime Books, Ltd., United Graphics, Inc., and Stanley R. SchragFifth Circuit· 1969-04-29· cited 33×
- Nucor Corporation v. Tennessee Forging Steel Service, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1973-04-17· cited 31×
- Unnamed caseEleventh Circuit· 1986-03-31· cited 29×
- Sapc, Inc. v. Lotus Development CorporationFirst Circuit· 1991-02-15· cited 18×
- Co-Opportunities, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.N.D. California· 1981-02-17· cited 16×
- International Tape Manufacturers Ass'n v. GersteinS.D. Florida· 1972-06-12· cited 16×
- Van Dusen v. Southeast First Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-29· cited 14×
- Richmond Homes Management, Inc. v. Raintree, Inc.W.D. Virginia· 1994-09-07· cited 14×
- Masterson v. McCroskieSupreme Court of Colorado· 1978-01-16· cited 13×
- National Medical Care, Inc. v. EspirituS.D. West Virginia· 2003-09-30· cited 13×
- Donald Frederick Evans & Associates, Inc. v. Continental Homes, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1986-03-31· cited 11×
- Shanahan v. MacCo Construction Co.California Court of Appeal· 1964-01-27· cited 10×
- Scholz Homes, Inc. v. Jake H. Maddox, Jr., and Boland-Maloney Lumber Company, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1967-06-20· cited 9×
- Masterson v. McCroskieColorado Court of Appeals· 1976-12-06· cited 7×
- Thistle, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1993-10-21· cited 7×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Baker v. SeldenSupreme Court· 1880-01-19· cited 300×
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausSecond Circuit· 1906-06-16· cited 40×
- Smith v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-10-27· cited 29×
- Manning v. Miller Music CorporationS.D. New York· 1959-06-10· cited 29×
- New Fiction Pub. Co. v. Star Co.S.D. New York· 1915-02-15· cited 28×
- Universal Film Mfg. Co. v. CoppermanS.D. New York· 1914-03-15· cited 22×
- Sieff v. Continental Auto Supply, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1941-05-16· cited 18×
- Group Publishers, Inc. v. WinchellS.D. New York· 1949-10-11· cited 18×
- Wright v. EisleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1903-07-01· cited 18×
- Muller v. Triborough Bridge AuthorityS.D. New York· 1942-01-14· cited 15×
- Lamb v. Grand Rapids School Furniture Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan· 1889-08-20· cited 13×
- Kriger v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.S.D. New York· 1941-11-27· cited 12×
- Fulmer v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1952-04-08· cited 6×
- Rochelle Asparagus Co. v. Princeville Canning Co.S.D. Illinois· 1959-03-06· cited 6×
- National Cloak & Suit Co. v. Standard Mail Order Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1911-10-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.