Design Home Remodeling Corp. v. Santana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that strict compliance with the timing requirements of Rule 1.442(b) is mandatory and premature proposals for settlement are invalid
• failure to comply with time requirements for offers of settlement cannot be considered “mere technical violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).