Design & Development, Inc. v. Vibromatic Manufacturing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s claim that he relied on the representations of a co-defendant’s attorney that “he had nothing to worry about” does not clearly qualify as a ground for relief from judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bryant, Inc. v. Walters
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1986-08-13· cited 101×
• Combs v. Coal & Mineral Management Services, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 1984-11-20· cited 48×
• Avila Group, Inc. v. Norma J. of California
  S.D. New York· 1977-02-16· cited 45×
• Stanley A. Klopp, Inc. v. John Deere Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-03-23· cited 39×
• Systems Industries, Inc. v. Han
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-02-14· cited 27×
• Collex, Inc. v. Walsh
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-04-26· cited 19×
• Pennsylvania National Bank & Trust Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-07-25· cited 19×
• Shawmut Bank, N.A. v. Chase
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-03-26· cited 17×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Spartan Mining Co.
  S.D. West Virginia· 1983-02-16· cited 17×
• Monte Produce, Inc. v. Delgado
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-05-28· cited 10×
• General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Olympic Gardens, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-12-14· cited 10×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wagg v. Hall
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1967-09-13· cited 16×
• Charles J. Webb Sons Co. v. Webber
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-04-13· cited 6×