DeSHIELDS v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This Court has held that participation in educational and rehabilitative programs, while commendable, does not, in and of itself, constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ for purposes of Rule 35(b).”
• “This Court has held that participation in educational and rehabilitative programs, while commendable, does not, in and of itself, constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ for purposes of Rule 35(b).”
• “This Court has held that participation in educational and rehabilitative programs, while commendable, does not, in and of itself, constitute ‘extraordinary circumstances’ for purposes of Rule 35(b).”
• “This Court has held that participation in educational and rehabilitative programs, while commendable, does not, in and of itself, constitute “extraordinary circumstances” for purposes of Rule 35(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Culp
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2016-12-08· cited 158×
• State of Delaware v. Rivera.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2014-08-11
• Hewett v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2014-10-07
• State of Delaware v. Weidow.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-03-11
• State of Delaware v. Johnson.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2015-06-08
• State of Delaware v. Tollis.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2016-01-04
• Callahan v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2016-08-22
• State v. Baker
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2020-06-09
• Evans v. Pierce
  D. Delaware· 2015-03-19