Deshawn E. v. Safir

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “there is a likelihood of recurring injury because the [challenged] activities are authorized by a written memorandum of understanding between the [city’s counsel] and the Police Commissioner”
• holding that a class of juveniles had standing to seek injunctive relief in federal court against future interrogations by a police squad because of the strong likelihood that the challenged interrogation methods would be used again
• “abstract injury is not enough; rather, the injury or threat of injury must be both real and immediate, not conjectural or hypothetical”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).