Skip to main content
· 5/20/1929

Desha v. Independence County Bridge District No. 1

Citations

  • 18 S.W.2d 337
  • 179 Ark. 561
  • 1929 Ark. LEXIS 115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • initial suit was against the plaintiff's employer and the plaintiff's recovery depended on being an employee; the employer then sued its insurer whose coverage excluded employees; the insurer's contention that the former judgment was decisive was upheld
  • initial suit was against the plaintiff’s employer and the plaintiff’s recovery depended on being an employee; the employer then sued its insurer whose coverage excluded employees; the insurer’s contention that the former judgment was decisive was upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.