· 5/20/1929
Desha v. Independence County Bridge District No. 1
Citations
- 18 S.W.2d 337
- 179 Ark. 561
- 1929 Ark. LEXIS 115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- initial suit was against the plaintiff's employer and the plaintiff's recovery depended on being an employee; the employer then sued its insurer whose coverage excluded employees; the insurer's contention that the former judgment was decisive was upheld
- initial suit was against the plaintiff’s employer and the plaintiff’s recovery depended on being an employee; the employer then sued its insurer whose coverage excluded employees; the insurer’s contention that the former judgment was decisive was upheld
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.