Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while a certain provision of Washington’s constitution was “identical” to Arizona’s, “it becomes apparent that the same meaning and effect was not intended by its adoption”
• noting that while a certain provision of Washington's constitution was \identical\ to Arizona's, \it becomes apparent that the same meaning and effect was not intended by its adoption\
• Arizona constitutional clause against uncompensated taking of private property “was adopted from the constitution of Washington”
• Arizona constitutional clause against uncompensated taking of private property \was adopted from the constitution of Washington\
• Arizona constitutional clause against uncompensated taking of private property \was adopted from the constitution of Washington\
• general statute remains applicable to all matters not dealt with in specific statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).