Skip to main content
· 4/14/2008

Deschenes v. State

Citations

  • 253 S.W.3d 374
  • 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 2659
  • 2008 WL 1721545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The mere fact that a person’s actions match a drug courier profile and that person is caAying a large amount of money that might'be involved in some illegal' activity is insufficient to establish probable cause to justify forfeiture.”
  • “The mere fact that a person’s actions match a drug courier profile and that person is carrying a large amount of money that might be involved in some illegal activity is insufficient to establish probable cause to justify forfeiture.”
  • “The mere fact that a person’s actions match a drug courier profile and that person is carrying a large amount of money that might be involved in some illegal activity is insufficient to establish probable cause to justify forfeiture.”
  • surveying case law in money laundering cases
  • not yet released for publication
  • not yet released for publication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell and Hancock and Pirtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.