Derringer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a public body complies with the IPRA through its designated custodian of records
• noting that because “[p]rima facie tort is not included in the specific provisions of the Tort Claims Act[,]” the governmental defendants were immune from the claim
• noting that because “[p]rima facie tort is not included in the specific provisions of the Tort Claims Act[,]” the governmental defendants were immune from the claim
• negligent infliction of emotional distress
• negligent infliction of emotional distress
• negligent infliction of emotional distress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).