Derrick v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the Federal Circuit recognized that plaintiffs were responsible for establishing the ‘but-for’ world”
• explaining that “the Federal Circuit recognized that plaintiffs were responsible for establishing the ‘but-for’ world”
• stating that the “but for” world must be achievable and realistic
• “[Bjecause plaintiffs in this case are seeking expectancy damages, it is incumbent upon them to establish a plausible ‘but-for’ world.”
• “[B]ecause plaintiffs in this case are seeking expectancy damages, it is incumbent upon them to establish a plausible ‘but-for’ world.”
• “[B]eeause plaintiffs in this case are seeking expectancy damages, it is incumbent upon them to establish a plausible ‘but-for’ world.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).