Eleventh Circuit· 7/14/2005

Derrick Rivers v. United States

Citations

416 F.3d 1319
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14212
2005 WL 1639331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “procedural ignorance [has never been accepted] as an excuse for prolonged inattention when a statute’s clear policy calls for promptness”
stating that “procedural ignorance [has never been accepted] as an excuse for prolonged inattention when a statute’s clear policy calls for promptness”
stating that “procedural ignorance [has never been accepted] as an excuse for prolonged inattention when a statute’s clear policy calls for promptness”
stating that “procedural ignorance [has never been accepted] as an excuse for prolonged inattention when a statute's clear policy calls for promptness”
stating that “procedural ignorance [has never been accepted] as an excuse for prolonged inattention when a statute's clear policy calls for promptness”
stating that “procedural ignorance [has never been accepted] as an excuse for prolonged inattention when a statute’s clear policy calls for promptness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Barkett, Per Curiam, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.