Derrick D. Smith and Valerie D. Smith v. Check-N-Go of Illinois, Inc., Sandra Brown and Deborah Jackson v. Check-N-Go of Illinois, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a judgment on the pleadings may be affirmed even though the district judge mistakenly cites Rule 12(b)(6)
• noting that a judgment on the plead- ings may be affirmed even though the district judge mistak- enly cites Rule 12(b)(6)
• noting that a judgment on the plead- ings may be affirmed even though the district judge mistak- enly cites Rule 12(b)(6)
• declaring that “[w]hat is ‘more conspicuous than any other disclosure’ depends on the contents of the form, not on how it affects any particular reader”
• finding that the finance charge and annual percentage rate disclosure on a loan agreement using a sample form were “more conspicuous” than the other disclosures, even where a circle had been hand-drawn around the due date disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).