Derrick Brandon Bush v. State of Tennessee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether a case requires retroactive application is a question of law that we review de novo
• holding that new rule was not a “watershed” rule because it was “simply an extension of [a] long- recognized constitutional doctrine”
• recognizing that, in some cases, due process may preclude strict application of the statute of limitations to a claim arising from the belated imposition of lifetime, community supervision but finding that, in that case, it did not
• stating that whether a new rule of constitutional law is entitled to retroactive application is a question of law subject to de novo review
• stating that whether a new rule of constitutional law is entitled to retroactive application is a question of law subject to de novo review
• stating that the Holland test adopted in Whitehead applies to all claims of due process tolling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).