Skip to main content
· 8/7/2013

Dereck Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc.

Citations

  • 725 F.3d 1170
  • 2013 WL 4007803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that we review for abuse of discretion the district court’s award of attorney’s fees under § 505
  • holding that we review for abuse of discretion the district court’s award of attorney’s fees under § 505
  • holding that the losing party was not objectively unreasonable where the winning party only won on two out of four “fair use factors”
  • explaining that a work is not transformative where the user \makes no alteration to the expressive content or message of the original work\
  • finding that use of copyrighted image at concert was only incidentally commercial because it was never used to market concert or merchandise
  • declining to find objective unreasonableness where the 24 case “was a close and difficult [one]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Trott, Clifton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.