Skip to main content
· 12/9/1999

Derdiger v. Tallman

Citations

  • 75 F. Supp. 2d 322
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18995
  • 1999 WL 1134451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “proxy statements that were mailed to ... stockholders during the merger” satisfied the requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCKELVIE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.