· 7/19/1988
Derderian v. Polaroid Corp.
Citations
- 121 F.R.D. 13
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7331
- 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,500
- 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 575
- 1988 WL 75082
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “while Rule 26(c) merely states ‘good cause’ as the standard for ruling on protective orders, ‘the federal courts have superimposed a somewhat more demanding balancing of interests approach to the Rule.’ ”
- allowing discovery of adverse reaction reports in redacted form
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Collings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.