Skip to main content
· 7/19/1988

Derderian v. Polaroid Corp.

Citations

  • 121 F.R.D. 13
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7331
  • 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,500
  • 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 575
  • 1988 WL 75082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “while Rule 26(c) merely states ‘good cause’ as the standard for ruling on protective orders, ‘the federal courts have superimposed a somewhat more demanding balancing of interests approach to the Rule.’ ”
  • allowing discovery of adverse reaction reports in redacted form

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.