DEPT. OF LEGAL AFF. v. Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that legislation that, once passed, benefited only a track in Seminole County, was a valid general law because the statute could be applied to tracks that might be built in the future
• concluding that legislation that, once passed, benefited only a track in Seminole County, was a valid general law because the statute could be applied to tracks that might be built in the future
• reasoning that the controlling point in evaluating the statute’s constitutionality was the openness of the class
• reasoning that the controlling point in evaluating the statute’s constitutionality was the openness of the class
• “[B]ecause of the nature of the enterprise, authorized gambling, this state may exercise greater control and use the police power in a more arbitrary manner.”
• “[B]ecause of the nature of the enterprise, authorized gambling, this state may exercise greater control and use the police power in a more arbitrary manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).