Skip to main content
· 4/24/2019

Dep't of Human Servs. v. H. R. E. (In re H. N. F.)

Citations

  • 441 P.3d 726
  • 297 Or. App. 247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a special master can review fee applications sua sponte
  • holding that “this court cannot subscribe to the notion that, because respondent failed to object to certain items, the Special Master was compelled . . . to find [the petitioners’] requests were reasonable, despite obvious indications to the contrary”
  • stating that at oral argument counsel for the Secretary “recognized that respondent has an obligation to challenge items believed to be unreasonable, if for no other reason 5 than to preserve the public fisc”
  • awarding rheumatologist Dr. Bennett a rate of $400 per hour

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aoyagi, Dehoog, Hadlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.