Skip to main content
· 5/2/2002

DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. Pitts

Citations

  • 815 So. 2d 738
  • 2002 WL 825944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating the suspension of a drivers license implicates a protectable property interest and due process applies to its denial
  • stating the suspension of a drivers license implicates a protectable property interest and due process applies to its denial
  • confirming that “the ‘suspension of a driver’s license for statutorily defined cause implicates a protectable property interest’ ” and, therefore, due process applies to its denial, quoting Mackey v. Montrym, 443 U.S. 1, 10-11, 99 S.Ct. 2612, 61 L.Ed.2d 321 (1979)
  • “It is without question that the ‘suspension of a driver’s license for statutorily defined cause implicates a protectible property interest.’ Mackey v. Montrym, 443 U.S. 1, 10, 99 S.Ct. 2612, 61 L.Ed.2d 321 (1979

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Nortwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.