DEPT. OF AGR. & CONSUMER SERV. v. Bonanno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that section 90.302 “sets forth the two types of rebuttable presumptions recognized in Florida”
• granting prohibition to keep the circuit court from exercising jurisdiction over citrus canker cases within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
• granting a writ of prohibition challenging the denial of a motion to dismiss a citrus canker lawsuit because the state removed jurisdiction over those cases from the circuit court and required them to be heard through the administrative hearings process
• \It is true that the legislature may not set conclusive values for property taken for a public purpose because the determination of just compensation is a judicial function.\
• \It is true that the legislature may not set conclusive values for property taken for a public purpose because the determination of just compensation is a judicial function.\
• “[A burden of production] is commonly referred to as a vanishing presumption, or a ‘bursting bubble’ presumption. Once evidence rebutting the presumption is introduced, the presumption disappears and the jury is not told of it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).