DePinto v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a taxpayer was not in the trade or business of being a corporate director for purposes of sec. 162 because he lacked a profit objective in such activity
• rejecting arguments “made in a boilerplate fashion without 5 any specific and concrete evidence that pursuing Plaintiff’s claims in the [contractual 6 forum] would be gravely difficult or inconvenient”
• rejecting arguments “made in a boilerplate fashion without 5 any specific and concrete evidence that pursuing Plaintiff’s claims in the [contractual 6 forum] would be gravely difficult or inconvenient”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).