DePinto v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Sherwin–Williams had an interest in performing its contractual obligation [and] Pulte . . . had an interest in receiving a usable product . . . These facts are sufficient to establish that a qualified privilege exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).