Depew v. Edmiston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a “rambling” 462-page complaint, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) where the complaint failed to satisfy Rule 8(a) or (d)
• dismissing complaint for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)’s short and concise pleading standards because the complaint included hundreds of exhibits and was replete with “swaths of irrelevant background material and exhibits”
• dismissing complaint for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)’s short and concise pleading standards because the complaint included hundreds of exhibits and was replete with “swaths of irrelevant background material and exhibits”
• dismissing complaint for failure to comply with “short and plain statement” requirement
• dismissing complaint for failure to comply with \short and plain statement\ requirement
• dismissing complaint that was “way too long, detailed and verbose for either the Court or the defendants to sort out the nature of the claims or evaluate whether the claims are actually supported by any comprehensible factual basis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).