Dependable Insurance Co. v. Horton (In Re Horton)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “affidavits of [creditor’s] employees stand merely as general denials that [creditor] received the [n]otice and are therefore insufficient to rebut the presumption of receipt”
• stating that the debtor may invoke the presumption of receipt after proper mailing based on a certificate stating that a notice . was mailed to every creditor on a list, including the creditor in question
• “There is no affirmative duty on the part of a debtor or his counsel to ascertain whether a creditor is represented by an attorney for purposes of assuring proper notice to creditors.”
• general denial that creditor received notice is insufficient to rebut presumption
• general denials of receipt insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).