DePasquale v. Harrington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \an expert administrative tribunal concerned with advancing the public welfare should not be rigidly governed by rules of evidence designed for juries\
• recognizing special competency of expert administrative tribunal to consider evidence that might be excluded from consideration by a jury under the rules of evidence
• noting that an agency's hearing officer has expertise in the relevant field

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).