Department of Transportation v. Dalton Paving & Construction, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exculpatory clause did not preclude recovery of prejudgment interest for breach of contract claims against DOT, where language does not contemplate such a claim
• letter admissible as original evidence of compliance with contract term requiring that letter be sent
• jury could conclude that DOT waived notice requirements where, among other things, “DOT expressly acknowledged that appellee’s . . . letter served as actual notice of appellee’s intent to file a claim”
• disapproved of on other grounds by RTT Assocs., 299 Ga. 78

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).