Department of Social & Health Services v. Rayfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutor’s characterization of defendant’s theory of the case as “so ridiculous that it isn’t even worthy of comment” not reversible error
• prosecutor’s characterization of defendant’s theory of the case as “so ridiculous that it isn’t even worthy of comment” not reversible error
• court would not engage in speculation and conjecture where the defendant established only that two African-Americans were excluded from the jury but failed to preserve the record as to the race of the jury or the other excluded venire members
• court would not engage in speculation and conjecture where the defendant established only that two African Americans were excluded from the jury but failed to preserve the record as to the race of the jury or the other excluded venire members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).