Skip to main content
· 6/1/1989

Department of Social & Health Services v. Chubb

Citations

  • 773 P.2d 851
  • 112 Wash. 2d 719
  • 1989 Wash. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an appeal of right exists under RAP 2.2(a) for \the disposition decision following the finding of dependency or to a marked change in the status quo\
  • holding that, in dependency proceedings, there is a right to appeal only the disposition decision following the finding of dependency or to a marked change in the status quo, which in effect amounts to a new disposition
  • lack of a clear legal argument with cited authority is grounds for dismissing an argument on appeal
  • disposition decisions following a finding of dependency are appealable as a matter of right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter, Callow, Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Dore, Pearson, Andersen, Durham, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.