Department of Revenue v. Quigley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that CAFRA was enacted \Din response to widespread criticism of [the existing proof] regime\
• explaining that CAFRA was enacted \Din response to widespread criticism of [the existing proof] regime\
• noting “the general rule 28 that ‘a court is to apply the law in effect at the time it renders its decision’”
• rejecting retroactive application of CAFRA and hold- ing that CAFRA’s heightened burden of proof applies only to a judicial forfeiture proceeding in which a complaint is filed on or after the statute’s effective date
• also noting that probable cause is a lower standard than preponderance of the evidence
• also noting that probable cause is a lower standard than preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).