Department of Revenue v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “designation of the ROD as final agency action under the APA is generally recog- nized”
• holding that the construction of a bypass road, which would “clos[e] off expansion” of an African-American neighborhood, does not have a sufficient “causal link” to the denial of housing to state a claim under section 3604(a)
• stating that because the APA does not include its own statute of limitations, the general statute of limitations set forth in § 2401(a) applies
• explaining that “every refusal” to take a particular action “does not revive the limitations period for the original [] decision.”
• explaining that a “direct remedy against funding recipients is not only ‘adequate,’ but . . . is preferable to a direct suit against the agency itself”
• listing examples of “housing-related” policies, such as “racial steering by real estate agents,” that fall under section 3604(a)’s prohibition of discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).