Skip to main content
· 11/30/1982

Department of Revenue v. Bailey

Citations

  • 294 Or. 145
  • 653 P.2d 1264
  • 1982 Ore. LEXIS 1316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because purposeful direction was established, it was “obvious” that the second prong of the minimum contacts test was also satisfied
  • recognizing that a corporation can suffer economic harm in many fora, including where the corporation has its principal place of business
  • holding that plaintiffs must make a prima facie case for jurisdiction to survive a motion to dis- miss
  • requiring that the defendant “have engaged in wrongful conduct targeted at a plaintiff’ known to be in the forum state (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • finding that past travels to the United States for business 13 mitigate an alleged burden of traveling to the United States for litigation
  • holding in 12 context of personal jurisdiction analysis that “California has a strong interest in providing a forum 13 for its residents and citizens who are tortiously injured”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tanzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.