· 11/30/1982
Department of Revenue v. Bailey
Citations
- 294 Or. 145
- 653 P.2d 1264
- 1982 Ore. LEXIS 1316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because purposeful direction was established, it was “obvious” that the second prong of the minimum contacts test was also satisfied
- recognizing that a corporation can suffer economic harm in many fora, including where the corporation has its principal place of business
- holding that plaintiffs must make a prima facie case for jurisdiction to survive a motion to dis- miss
- requiring that the defendant “have engaged in wrongful conduct targeted at a plaintiff’ known to be in the forum state (internal quotation marks omitted)
- finding that past travels to the United States for business 13 mitigate an alleged burden of traveling to the United States for litigation
- holding in 12 context of personal jurisdiction analysis that “California has a strong interest in providing a forum 13 for its residents and citizens who are tortiously injured”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tanzer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.