Skip to main content
· 8/21/2006

Department of Labor & Industries v. Lanier Brugh Corp.

Citations

  • 134 Wash. App. 1044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the deletion of a phrase when amending a statute “raises an inference that a change in the law was intended” and that we “must not assume that such omission was accidental and then by construction insert what may have been omitted by design”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.