Skip to main content
· 6/15/2011

Department of Human Services v. G. E.

Citations

  • 260 P.3d 516
  • 243 Or. App. 471
  • 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing and remand- ing where juvenile court, in denying the mother’s motion to dismiss, “may have based its decision on some facts that are extrinsic to the jurisdictional judgment”
  • “In the original judgment, mother was faulted for recklessly exposing [the child] to deadly weapons; here, mother is faulted for inattention.”
  • juvenile court may not rely on allegation that is extrinsic to the original jurisdiction judgment
  • It is “axiomatic that a juvenile court may not continue a wardship based on facts that have never been alleged in a jurisdictional petition.”
  • court may not continue dependency jurisdiction over a child based on facts not alleged in or inferable from jurisdictional petition, where reliance on those facts affects substantial rights of the parent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.