· 3/14/2012
Department of Human Services v. D. M.
Citations
- 275 P.3d 971
- 248 Or. App. 683
- 2012 WL 839559
- 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- formulations in Smith and A. F. “complement each other and correctly state the standard” for juvenile court jurisdiction under ORS 419B.100(1)(c)
- formulations in Smith and A. F. ‘complement each other and correctly state the standard’ for juvenile court jurisdiction under ORS 419B.100(l)(c)
- A parent’s behavior must be sufficient to “justify state intervention into a parent’s fundamental right to the care, control, and custody of her children.”
- although the mother “may or may not have been an ideal parent,” the state failed to prove that the mother exposed children to threat of serious loss or injury
- mother allowing daughter to overhear conversation about mother’s former activities as a professional escort and adult dancer, allowing daughter to receive expensive gifts from an adult male, and failing to supervise child’s internet use was not a threat of serious loss or injury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.