Skip to main content
· 3/14/2012

Department of Human Services v. D. M.

Citations

  • 275 P.3d 971
  • 248 Or. App. 683
  • 2012 WL 839559
  • 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • formulations in Smith and A. F. “complement each other and correctly state the standard” for juvenile court jurisdiction under ORS 419B.100(1)(c)
  • formulations in Smith and A. F. ‘complement each other and correctly state the standard’ for juvenile court jurisdiction under ORS 419B.100(l)(c)
  • A parent’s behavior must be sufficient to “justify state intervention into a parent’s fundamental right to the care, control, and custody of her children.”
  • although the mother “may or may not have been an ideal parent,” the state failed to prove that the mother exposed children to threat of serious loss or injury
  • mother allowing daughter to overhear conversation about mother’s former activities as a professional escort and adult dancer, allowing daughter to receive expensive gifts from an adult male, and failing to supervise child’s internet use was not a threat of serious loss or injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.