Skip to main content
· 7/18/1996

Department of Educ. v. Roe

Citations

  • 679 So. 2d 756
  • 1996 WL 399860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, unlike qualified immunity, the agency's immunity from liability provided by section 768.28 is not lost simply because review must wait until after final judgment
  • finding no right to be free from trial for the state and clarifying that bearing the cost of litigation is not a loss sufficient for a collateral order
  • \[I]n Tucker we had an interest in affording federal causes of action brought in state court the same treatment they would receive if brought in federal court.\
  • characterizing sovereign immunity as an affirmative defense
  • explaining the reason for the result in Mandico

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grimes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.