Department of Corrections v. Grubbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court violated the separation of powers doctrine when it ordered the Department of Corrections to pay for a convicted sex offender’s treatment program
• granting petition for writ of certiorari and quashing order directing DOC to pay for a sex offender’s treatment
• stating petitioner’s nonparty status in criminal proceedings left it with no adequate remedy by direct appeal
• “The judiciary branch may not interfere with legislative discretion in determining the funds required of an executive branch agency nor with the agency’s executive discretion in spending appropriated funds.”
• “DOC’s nonparty status deprives it of an adequate remedy by direct appeal.”
• “DOC,.a nonparty to the criminal proceeding, filed a petition for writ of certiorari in this court seeking relief from the trial court’s order. We have jurisdiction because DOC’s non-party status deprives it of an adequate remedy-by direct appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).