Department of Children & Families v. C.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• both cases declining review under Golding and finding proper instruction describing reasonable doubt as “a doubt for which a valid reason may be assigned”
• “[although a clarifying amendment of the rules of practice to address the problem illuminated by this case might well be desirable, this court does not sit as the [r]ules [c]ommittee of the Superior Court”
• “[although a clarifying amendment [to] the rules of practice to address the problem illuminated . . . might well be desirable, this court does not sit as the [r]ules [c]ommittee of the Superior Court”
• ‘‘[a]lthough a clarifying amendment [to] the rules of practice to address the problem illuminated by this case might well be desirable, this court does not sit as the Rules Com- mittee’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).