Skip to main content
· 12/12/2023

Departamento De La Vivienda v. Johannes Motta, Wanda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s dismissal of action for lack of standing solely on the basis of plaintiff’s failure to satisfy the zone-of-interests prudential consideration
  • “Because none of the state law claims were included in the complaint, we need not consider them.”
  • alleged denial of right to cast undiluted vote not within zone of interests of equal protection clause
  • alleged denial of right to cast undiluted vote not within zone of interests of equal protection clause
  • plaintiff must establish prudential standing in addition to the constitutional requirements
  • declining to consider claims not included in the complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.