· 12/12/2023
Departamento De La Vivienda v. Johannes Motta, Wanda
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s dismissal of action for lack of standing solely on the basis of plaintiff’s failure to satisfy the zone-of-interests prudential consideration
- “Because none of the state law claims were included in the complaint, we need not consider them.”
- alleged denial of right to cast undiluted vote not within zone of interests of equal protection clause
- alleged denial of right to cast undiluted vote not within zone of interests of equal protection clause
- plaintiff must establish prudential standing in addition to the constitutional requirements
- declining to consider claims not included in the complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.