Denzler v. Henrico County School Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding waiver of the only issue presented on appeal of district court’s dismissal of a bankruptcy appeal where appellant’s brief merely argued why the Bankruptcy Court erred below
• finding waiver of the only issue presented on appeal of district court’s dismissal of a bankruptcy appeal where appellant’s brief merely argued why the Bankruptcy Court erred below
• finding waiver of the only issue presented on appeal of district court’s dismissal of a bankruptcy appeal where appellant’s brief merely argued why the Bankruptcy Court erred below
• commenting as to the third Poulis factor that the pro se appellant had a history of dilatoriness, beginning with his failure to pay the filing fee in the bankruptcy court or seek an extension of time to file any of the required documents
• agreeing with the district court that the appellees had been prejudiced because the bankruptcy appellant “had not advanced the appeal for four months, and had been unable to address the merits of the case due to his failure to identify issues or the record”
• “Appellees are unable to address the merits of the case without a clear statement of the issues to be briefed or the record upon which that brief will be based”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).