DeNucci v. Henningsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adjudicating appeal from Oregon state trial court’s resolution of appellant’s § 1983 false arrest claim
• court assumes that legislature enacts statutes in light of existing judicial decisions relevant to the statutes
• failure to give timely notice required under the OTCA is “fatal” to a plaintiff’s claims
• \We conclude that [Representative Prozanski's] statement indicates that the noise of a person's voice is not physical conduct capable of violating the statute.\
• qualified immunity attached where the plaintiff was arrested, despite the fact that she was physically compliant with the police officer’s orders to stay back, because she was yelling
• ORS 162.247(1)(a) does not apply to mere noise like a person’s voice that distracts an officer; it applies only to “physical conduct” that prevents or attempts to prevent an officer from per- forming the officer’s duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).