Denton Regional Medical Center v. LaCroix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that medical-negligence claims against health-care providers are independent of direct-liability claims against hospital and that hospital can be held hable even if individual doctor is found not to be medically negligent
• holding that expert testimony is required to establish “want of skill and attention”
• holding that expert testimony is required to establish “want of skill and attention”
• holding that expert testimony is required to establish \want of skill and attention\
• holding that expert testimony is required to establish \want of skill and attention\
• stating the medical expert testimony is required to establish standard of care for matters involving the performance of medical procedures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).