Dent v. Kaufman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ignoring Comment because a \federal court is not bound by state court interpretations of the codes of professional responsibility\
• adopting Niesig test although “control group” test would be more straightforward
• ig noring Comment because a “federal court is not bound by state court interpretations of the codes of professional responsibility”
• no matter how damning, coworker’s observations of improper behavior of colleagues would not constitute admission
• no-contact rule does not exist “to protect a corporate party from the revelation of prejudicial facts”
• \Rule 4.2 is functionally identical to\ DR 7-104(A)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).