· 1/15/1832
Dent v. Chiles
Citations
- 5 Stew. & P. 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a property interest in trade secrets or other confidential research and development information is sufficient to justify intervention as a matter of right
- “[T]he Court must accept the moving party’s well-pleaded allegations as valid.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lipscomb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.