Denson v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction to hear protests regarding AbilityOne’s decision to add a service to the Procurement List and, if warranted, to grant an appropriate remedy
• affording Skidmore deference to agency Guidelines the Government argued it could ignore and finding that the Government’s argument was not well taken
• “The [VA] is responsible for implementing the Veterans Benefits Act; indeed, it is the only federal department or agency to which the Act's requirements apply.”
• “The [VA] is responsible for implementing the Veterans Benefits Act; indeed, it is the only federal department or agency to which the Act's requirements apply.”
• the Committee’s decision to place services on the list is “manifestly part of a procurement process for the laundry services and thus fall[s] within the jurisdictional ambit of 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1)”
• “The first two portions of Section 1491(b)(1) address pre-award and post-award bid protests” while “the third portion of the Section concerns protests involving ‘any alleged violation of statute or regulation in connection with a procurement or a proposed procurement.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).